Terraform vs. Ansible: Understanding the Key Differences

Terraform is a tool used for creating and managing IT infrastructure. Ansible automates provisioning, deployment, and other IT processes.

Last Updated: September 20, 2022

Terraform is defined as an infrastructure as code (IaC) tool that is used to create and manage IT infrastructure effectively. Ansible is defined as an open-source automation solution that is used to automate numerous IT processes, such as provisioning, managing configurations, and orchestrating and deploying applications. This article covers the key differences between these two tools.

Terraform vs. Ansible

Terraform is an infrastructure as code (IaC) tool that was created by HashiCorp and is used to build and manage infrastructure effectively. Ansible is an open-source automation solution that is used to automate numerous IT processes, such as provisioning, managing configurations, and orchestrating and deploying applications. It has been developed through contributions from Ansible Inc., the Ansible community, and Red Hat Inc.

Before we dive into the differences between these two tools, let’s take a look at their detailed definitions.

What Is Terraform?

Terraform enables DevOps teams to create and deploy various infrastructure resources such as virtual machines, load balancers, and networks through the use of descriptive languages and models. Terraform’s infrastructure as code (IaC) platform prevents IT infrastructure from shifting from the desired configuration.

This solution is used for the secure and effective creation, modification, and versioning of infrastructure. It is leveraged for managing both proprietary solutions and those provided by popular vendors. It uses the easy-to-learn and declarative HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) for defining and provisioning end-to-end IT infrastructure.

Terraform-managed infrastructure can be hosted on-premise via private clouds such as VMWare vSphere, CloudStack, and OpenStack, as well as on public clouds such as Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure.

Teams using multicloud infrastructure can rely on Terraform to create a single workflow across cloud platforms. Even teams currently operating on a single cloud will find value in Terraform, especially as it makes the transition to multicloud smoother in the future.

Advantages of Terraform

  • Provides stable infrastructure as code that supports smooth changes in configuration.
  • Supports numerous popular service providers, including Google Cloud, AWS, and Azure.
  • Capable of configuration management and orchestration.
  • The HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) used is simple to learn. An alternate JSON-compatible syntax is also supported.
  • Allows for smooth transition among providers.
  • Removes the need for additional server-side configuration management through support for client-only architecture.

Disadvantages of Terraform

  • Lack of error handling.
  • Continuous need for states to be synchronized with the infrastructure.
  • HCL must be learned if the user does not opt for the alternate JSON-compatible syntax.
  • Some users may find it challenging to rename resources or shift them deeper into modules.

See More: What Is Container Orchestration? Working, Importance, Challenges and Tools

What Is Ansible?

The open-source Ansible engine automates provisioning, orchestration, deployment, configuration management, and numerous other IT processes. A key benefit of Ansible is simplified, powerful automation for cross-platform IT support. Its easy-to-deploy nature and lack of dependency on security infrastructure and agent software make it ideal for simplifying organizational IT processes.

Companies leverage the automation capabilities of Ansible for day-to-day IT tasks such as software installation, infrastructure provisioning, and security measures such as patch management. Other applications of this solution include updating servers and workstations, intra-service orchestration, cloud provisioning, and other system administration tasks.

Ansible automates tasks through instructions written in a simple script form, which also allows for streamlined version control. Its features enable DevOps personnel to leverage the strength of IaC and allow for server and client infrastructure to be managed similarly to software development. The creation of proven solutions for organizational upkeep becomes easy with Ansible as it ensures effective and persistent self-documentation regardless of workforce changes.

Apart from organizational applications, Ansible is useful to end users, allowing them to configure a single computer as well as entire computer networks at once. Users need not have an in-depth understanding of programming to use it; its instructions are readable by humans and its files are easily understandable.

Advantages of Ansible

  • Uses Python for easy readability and extendability.
  • Simple to install and configure.
  • Agentless client configuration.
  • High scalability.
  • Access to the Ansible Galaxy portal, a central repository for shared Ansible content.

Disadvantages of Ansible

  • Poor UI:

Ansible was originally created as a command-line interface (CLI) tool. The first attempt to create a UI for it was with AXW GUI, while the other UI component was the REST endpoint for simplified infrastructure management.

Soon, AWX was replaced with the Ansible Tower web management UI. Ansible Tower offers a team-centric workflow instrument and user-friendly visual management features. However, it cannot complete all tasks that the CLI is capable of and needs improvements.

  • Conflicting query results:

Ansible’s poor UI may occasionally lead to synchronization failures between the CLI and the GUI. This can cause the tool to generate conflicting query results.

  • No notion of state:

Unlike some other automation tools, Ansible lacks a notion of state. Instead of tracking dependencies, the engine carries out tasks sequentially until completion and terminates the process in case of any errors.

This is not ideal if a requirement for a detailed ordering catalog exists. Such a catalog, currently unsupported by Ansible, allows achieving a particular state while resisting fluctuations in environmental conditions.

  • Lack of comprehensive Windows support:

Microsoft Windows is a popular operating system in the enterprise landscape. However, Ansible support for Windows is limited to a certain extent.

Although Ansible supports both Windows and Linux/Unix nodes, it uses native PowerShell remoting instead of SSH for Windows. This leads to Linux control machines being mandatory for Windows host management. Limited Windows support can lead to setbacks in automation and configuration management.

Note: While Ansible version 2.8 has introduced SSH connectivity for Windows-managed nodes, this feature is experimental and its implementation may execute changes that are backward incompatible in feature releases. Based on the installed version, server-side components may exhibit unreliability.

  • Emerging solution:

While Ansible enjoys vibrant community support, this may be lacking when compared to that of its older competitors. Engineers with in-depth experience in Ansible may also be hard to come by when compared to other similar DevOps tools. Finally, its emerging nature indicates the possibility of bugs, issues, and edge scenarios that are yet to be discovered.

See More: What Is DevOps Lifecycle? Definition, Key Components, and Management Best Practices

Key Comparisons: Similarities and Differences

At the core of the discussion, Terraform is an infrastructure as code (IaC) platform, while Ansible is an automation platform. Let’s dive into the key comparisons.

Similarities

The key similarities between Terraform and Ansible include:

  • Both solutions can carry out high-level common functionalities and are capable of configuring new cloud infrastructure with all the required application components.
  • Both solutions are masterless and their ‘state’ data does not require separate infrastructure for management.
  • Both solutions can execute commands on newly set up virtual machines as they are agentless.
  • Both solutions are capable of executing configuration operations over SSH and can set up infrastructure by using the application programming interfaces (APIs) provided by cloud vendors.

Differences

While both Terraform and Ansible are capable of similar high-level functions, such as configuration automation and infrastructure deployment, certain key differences exist between them, such as:

1. Approach

Terraform Ansible
Terraform’s declarative approach enables it to achieve the desired end state as defined by the system administrator and can rectify changes in the defined environment too.

Once the end state is defined, the tool automatically executes the necessary steps to achieve it. Users can describe the desired state and automate the transition process from one state to another.

Ansible follows a hybrid approach with both procedural and declarative configurations.

Ad hoc commands are executed for the implementation of procedural configurations.

The Ansible documentation contains in-depth insights on its approach and teaches users the effects of adding and subtracting resources for achieving the desired results. It is important to explicitly indicate the resource requirements when leveraging Ansible.

 

2. Key Features

Terraform Ansible
Many IaC solutions, including leading ones such as AWS CloudFormation and Azure Resource Manager, are tied to specific platforms. Terraform, on the other hand, is platform-agnostic and can be used to manage infrastructure across architectures.

Users can create reusable configurations for provisioning across environments. Reusable components can also be created within configuration files via modules.

Terraform also features managed states, with state files monitoring all modifications within the environment. Changes are tracked and cannot occur without explicit user specification. Automation allows Terraform to spot and fix config drifts to ensure the desired state is met at all times.

Terraform simplifies rollbacks through version-controlled configurations and managed states, thus removing the need for complicated reconfigurations.

Finally, Terraform’s workflow allows for simplified integration with any CI/CD pipeline, thus driving the end-to-end automation of infrastructure management.

Comprehensive, easy-to-understand documentation makes Ansible simple to learn for both, professionals and beginners.

Ansible does not use a dependency system, thus executing tasks sequentially and stopping once an error is identified. This simplifies troubleshooting–even for beginners.

Another key feature of Ansible is the use of the human-readable Python language, which makes setup simple via Python libraries that are present on most Linux distributions.

Any language can be used for creating Ansible modules as long as data is returned in JSON format.

Playbooks, as Ansible configuration files are known, are written in YAML. This allows for easy readability, support for comments, and the use of anchors for referencing, and helps boost Ansible’s automation and configuration management capabilities.

All Ansible master-agent communications run via Paramiko or Standard SSH. This removes the need for installing agents for managing remote systems and minimizes performance degradation and maintenance overheads.

Finally, the Ansible Galaxy is useful for sharing and receiving Ansible-related content. For instance, a user can download reusable roles for installing applications and configuring servers. This can potentially boost the speed of deployments.

 

3. Modules

Terraform Ansible
Terraform modules are leveraged for using and reusing complex resources as required. Each module serves as a container for infrastructure resources grouped together by the developer.

Modules have an input variable as well as an output variable. While the former accepts values from a calling module, the latter returns data to the calling module. Configurations are sped up through modules calling each other.

The Terraform Registry is a centralized repository for sharing modules. It enables users to discover and access Terraform modules and is available in public and private variants. 

While the former contains services that support API interactions for exposing and managing particular resource and community-sourced modules, the latter contains services for modules used internally by enterprises.

Publishing modules to the Terraform Registry requires them to have a naming structure, a standard module structure, a repository description, a compatible version control system, and release tags.

Each Ansible module is written to serve as a model for the required system state. For instance, a sysadmin might require that all enterprise endpoints install a specific version of a program, Ansible’s packaging module will determine whether this state is true for each node. 

If an endpoint with a different version of the software is detected, Ansible will determine the operating system of that endpoint and execute the steps to update the software accordingly. In this example, all endpoints in the organization are updated overnight!

However, infrastructure maintenance is more than simply checking software versions. Using Ansible essentially means using its modules, as each module performs a particular task.

If users need to automate a specific process across multiple endpoints, they will need to first locate the best-suited module for the task at hand. Then, they must install Ansible, configure the module, and execute it. Users with programming experience can also write custom modules for specialized tasks.

Finally, if any user deems a module to be useful for others and wishes to share it, they may do so by submitting it to the Ansible Project for inclusion.

 

4. State Management

Terraform Ansible
State management is a key aspect of Terraform operations. The platform manages the entire lifecycle of all resources under its administration.

States are responsible for both, providing and monitoring configuration changes. All state files map the most recent configuration of infrastructure resources.

Users can import preexisting resources under Terraform management by using state files from external infrastructure.

Finally, users can query state files to gain insights into infrastructure components and their present characteristics.

Conversely, Ansible does not feature lifecycle management.

Since configuration management is a key feature of Ansible and immutable infrastructure is assumed by default, modifications made to the configuration are executed automatically on the target resource.

 

5. Use Cases

Terraform Ansible
  • Simplifying collaboration:

Terraform Cloud can directly connect with the user’s version control system (VCS) provider. This helps ensure effective version control in IaC and enables team-level collaboration on infrastructure. Users get specific code versions that can be used for creating different environments for testing or other applications.

  • Creating reproducible and transient environments:

Terraform lets users share and reuse infrastructure and allows for environments to be recreated repeatedly. For instance, the production environment can be codified and then distributed for QA, development, or staging. Each configuration can be used for the swift creation of new testing environments and then disposed of.

  • Multicloud:

Existing infrastructure management solutions are often cloud-specific, making multicloud deployments challenging. By being cloud-agnostic, Terraform enables users to leverage one configuration for managing multiple providers and administering cross-cloud dependencies. Multicloud orchestration and management become easy with Terraform, allowing for seamless large-scale infrastructure deployments.

  • Multi-tier applications:

A collection of resources can be referred to as a tier. With Terraform, the dependencies among tiers are managed automatically. For instance, the database tier is made available prior to the web servers commencing operations, and the web nodes are visible to the load balancers. 

The scaling of tiers is simplified with Terraform, as a user only needs to modify a single count configuration value. Through the codified and automated creation and provisioning of resources, elastic scaling with load is simplified.

Terraform’s readability allows network engineers to simplify the codification of SDN configuration.

  • Prepackaged configurations:

Registries simplify locating prepackaged configurations that can be tweaked to fulfill a specific goal or even leveraged as is.

  • Resource scheduling:

Terraform modules are capable of allowing Kubernetes to schedule Docker containers and for stopping and starting resources on the cloud.

  • External resource management:

Finally, Terraform is compatible with cloud infrastructure (both public and private), software as a service (SaaS) deployments, and network appliances.

  • Configuration management:

Lightweight, secure, and reliable, Ansible simplifies the automation of day-to-day IT processes. It has a gentle learning curve and can be practiced easily by developers, administrators, and other IT personnel alike. Ansible features data descriptions for infrastructure that are easily decipherable for both humans and machines. This allows users to easily understand the details of configuration tasks.

  • Infrastructure provisioning:

Ansible makes it easy to prepare infrastructure such as cloud platforms or servers for application installation and configuration. It removes the strain associated with provisioning hundreds of servers manually and allows for swift and reliable scaling of IT infrastructure. 

Using the right Ansible playbook allows users to build a single instance and replicate it on numerous servers with similar infrastructure parameters. Once provisioned, the environment can be configured using Ansible’s effective IT operational lifecycle management capabilities.

  • Application deployment:

Ansible is used for the reliable and consistent deployment of multi-tier applications from a single common framework. It also allows users to configure the required services and push application artifacts from a common system.

Additionally, it removes the need for custom code for system automation, enabling users to get the same results by writing simple task descriptions that any team member can understand. This helps make the DevOps process dynamic and cost-effective, especially over the long term.

  • Cloud provisioning:

Similar to infrastructure provisioning, Ansible is an effective automation tool for cloud provisioning. It supports multiple cloud platforms, network devices, bare-metal servers, and virtualized hosts.

  • Security and compliance:

Finally, Ansible is an effective tool for automating the implementation of enterprise-wide security policies such as locking down users or adding firewall rules.

The user simply needs to configure the relevant security parameters on the control machine and execute the associated playbook. Ansible will automatically update all target hosts remotely. It also removes the need for the manual monitoring of individual endpoints for security compliance. And, as an added security measure, admin credentials cannot be retrieved in plaintext on Ansible.

See More: What Is ETL (Extract, Transform, Load)? Meaning, Process, and Tools

Takeaway

While they share several similarities, both Terraform and Ansible have unique advantages and limitations.

While Terraform shines in its scheduling capabilities and user-friendliness, Ansible’s strength lies in its security functionalities. Ansible is more mature and can seamlessly work with traditional automation frameworks. It speeds up coding and simplifies operations. Conversely, Terraform might be better for orchestration services, logical dependencies, and interconnected applications.

In terms of use cases, Terraform is preferable for containerized solutions deployed for provisioning software within a cloud platform. In comparison, Ansible helps users gain reasonable control over enterprise devices and explore methods for deploying underlying components.

Finally, Terraform excels at provisioning infrastructure across cloud platforms and is compatible with over 200 providers. On the other hand, Ansible is ideal for configuration management and provisioning. The two solutions can even work together if the use case calls for it.

Did this article provide useful insights on the differences between Terraform and Ansible? Let us know on FacebookOpens a new window , TwitterOpens a new window , or LinkedInOpens a new window ! 

MORE ON DEVOPS

Hossein Ashtari
Interested in cutting-edge tech from a young age, Hossein is passionate about staying up to date on the latest technologies in the market and writes about them regularly. He has worked with leaders in the cloud and IT domains, including Amazon—creating and analyzing content, and even helping set up and run tech content properties from scratch. When he’s not working, you’re likely to find him reading or gaming!
Take me to Community
Do you still have questions? Head over to the Spiceworks Community to find answers.